There is a particular kind of mess that only comes from working with your hands — glue on your fingers, paper scraps on the floor, a half-finished thing staring back at you from the table. I've been living inside that mess for a few years now, and I think it's quietly making me a better designer.
This is my attempt to explain why.
What this is — and what it isn't
My art practice sits somewhere between collage and analog experimentation. I cut, I layer, I print, I tear. I use found images, textures, painted surfaces, and whatever else feels right that day. The work is never fully planned it grows through decisions made in the moment, one material responding to another.
It's not illustration. It's not graphic design with a different hat on. It's a separate space, one where I've deliberately removed the grid, the screen, and the undo button.
"When I take the undo button away, I have to commit. And commitment, I've learned, is a muscle."
I started this as an experiment, a way to keep my visual instincts sharp outside of client work. Screens train you to think in vectors and pixels, in clean edges and repeatable systems. Analog work pushes back. Paper resists. Ink bleeds. The eye has to adjust, not the software.
What I've found is that working this way, slowly, physically, without the safety net of commands, has changed how I see. I notice texture more. I'm more comfortable with asymmetry. I make fewer timid choices in my professional work because I've practiced being decisive somewhere low-stakes first.
The collage method in particular has sharpened how I compose. When you're physically moving pieces around a surface, you're doing something very close to what a designer does on a layout, weighing hierarchy, rhythm, negative space, tension. Except your hands remember it differently than your mouse does.
.webp){kind=icon}